|
|||||||||||||||||
|
PROGRAMS
|
| |
ABOUT US
|
| | CONTRIBUTE | | |
MEDIA ROOM |
| |
|
Urge
the U.S. Government to End Discriminatory Treatment of Haitian Asylum
Seekers Women at Risk: Unfair U.S. Laws Hurt Asylum Seekers To request hard copies of the report, please call 212 845-5259 Abstract from "The Welcome Mat Frays," a December 28th, 2002 NY Times editorial on the state of the U.S. asylum system This newsletter is for people interested in protecting asylum -seekers and refugees in the United States. LCHR has been advocating for refugees for two decades, and helping thousands to obtain asylum in the United States. Latest Issues #21 December 11, 2024 Court TV Film, Inspired by Lawyers Committee Case, Shines a Light on U.S. Detention of Asylum Seekers #20 November 5, 2024 Asylum Seekers Protest Detention with Hunger-Strike #19 October 15, 2024 New DHS Initiatives Impact Asylum Seekers and Detention Policies #18 July 28, 2024 U.S. Policy Unfair to Those Detained at Sea #17 July 10, 2024 Refugee Resettlement at Record Low Past Issues #16 June 17, 2025 Refugees Seeking Asylum Behind Bars #15 May 15, 2003 Operation Liberty Shield Quietly Terminated #14 May 7, 2025 Refugee Women Still at Risk #13 Apr. 28, 2003 Attorney General Ashcroft Calls for Blanket Detentions of Haitian Asylum Seekers #12 Mar. 19, 2003 Department of Homeland Security Targets Asylum Seekers for Detention #11. Feb. 20, 2003 Urgent Action on Refugee Women at Risk #10. Jan. 15, 2002 New Lawyers Committee Report Outlines Barriers Facing Refugee Women who Seek Asylum in the U.S. #9. Nov. 26, 2002 Refugees Fleeing Religious Persecution Treated Unfairly #8. Nov. 13, 2002 INS Authorizes Expedited Removal for Migrants Arriving by Sea" #7. Nov. 8, 2002 Haitian Asylum Seekers Selectively Targeted by US Policies #6. Aug 8, 2024 U.S.-Canada Agreement Would Require Asylum-Seekers to Apply Where They Arrive First - Causing Further Hardship Special
Edition: #5.
Feb. 20, 2002 #4.
Dec. 21, 2001 #3.
Nov. 27, 2001 #2.
Nov. 14, 2001 #1.
Oct. 31, 2001 Asylum |
Asylum Protection News 20 Asylum Seekers Protest Detention with Hunger-Strike:
Complaints Included Length of Detention, Unfair DHS Parole Policies, and
Jail-like Conditions Two of these detainees, Viktor Odnovyun and Oleksiy Galushka, have each been detained for a total of over 3 years and 9 months by the INS and now the Department of Homeland Security, despite the fact that an immigration judge has granted them withholding of removal under the Convention Against Torture. DHS has refused to parole them while it appeals the immigration judge’s decision, even though their parole applications are supported by 28 letters of support from their employers, friends, and fellow parishioners in Pennsylvania and even though the two men appeared for all immigration proceedings when they had been previously paroled. The Wackenhut Hunger-Strike Asylum seekers who arrive at U.S. airports without proper documents are
detained upon their arrival. Once they pass a screening interview, asylum
seekers are eligible to be paroled if they satisfy certain INS, now DHS,
criteria - criteria which includes community ties, no risk to the
community, and that identity can be established. But even asylum seekers
who meet these criteria continue to be detained, as documented in several
reports issued by the Lawyers Committee. On Tuesday, October 21, some detainees at the Wackenhut facility in Queens began refusing to eat meals. According to detainee reports, all male detainees began refusing meals on Wednesday, October 22 and most began eating again during the following week, although at least two detainees only began eating again on November 2nd. Detainees reported that they were protesting a range of DHS detention issues, including:
Viktor Odnovyun and Oleksiy Galushka have been detained for a total of three years and nine months - first at the Wackenhut facility, then at York County Prison in Pennsylvania, and now after a period of parole, at the Wackenhut detention facility again. They are represented pro bono by volunteer attorneys through the Lawyers Committee’s pro bono asylum representation program. The two arrived in the U.S. in March 1999, seeking asylum from their
native Ukraine where they were persecuted by the police, security forces,
and government-sanctioned vigilantes due to their activism in non-governmental
organizations and the political opinions attributed to them as a result
of their activism. They were detained on arrival at the airport because
although they were traveling on their own Ukrainian passports, they lacked
visas for entry to the U.S. They passed their credible fear screening
interviews but continued to be detained - first at Wackenhut and
then at York County Prison. In September 1999, an immigration judge granted
them withholding of removal but denied them asylum because he believed
they had the right to reside in Argentina. After a series of appeals,
the Federal Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit remanded their cases,
as part of a settlement agreement, in connection with which the INS agreed
to release the two men on parole while their remand proceedings continued.
The Immigration Judge granted both men withholding of removal under the
Convention Against Torture. The DHS (ICE) Trial Attorney announced that
she would appeal this grant of relief, and directed that both men be re-detained.
They were both detained on the spot. Their attorneys had to move their
car into long-term parking at JFK Airport until friends from Pennsylvania
could come retrieve it. Both Viktor and Oleksiy participated in the hunger-strike at Wackenhut.
They resumed eating on Saturday, November 1 after losing about 20 pounds
each. More information on
Asylum in the U.S. |
||||||||||||