Recent Victory for Haitian Refugees Thwarted
by Department of Homeland Security;
Major Refugee Rights Organizations Decry Decision
New York, NY, March 21, 2003— A request yesterday by the Department
of Homeland Security (DHS) to Attorney General John Ashcroft to block
the release of Haitian asylum seekers detained since October 2002
for national security reasons is a dangerous exploitation of the very
real national security dangers we face, according to a group of refugee
rights organizations who strongly oppose the request. The Florida
Immigrant Advocacy Center (FIAC), the Lawyers Committee for Human
Rights, and the Women’s Commission for Refugee Women and Children
contend that this unprecedented step marks the latest in a series
of restrictive measures initiated by the Bush Administration to prevent
and deter the arrival of Haitian refugees in the United States, despite
the rapidly deteriorating human rights situation in that country.
“While Haitians have often been singled out for discriminatory
treatment under our asylum laws and policies, this is the first
time that national security has been used to justify such restrictions,”
says Wendy Young, Director of Government Relations for the Women’s
Commission. “It is outrageous that the Administration is willing
to manipulate our very serious national security challenges to justify
restrictive actions taken against nationals of Haiti—a country
that has never once been cited as posing a threat to the safety
of the American people.”
DHS’s request comes on the heels of a significant recent
victory for Haitian asylum seekers. The Justice Department’s
Board of Immigration Appeals, the highest immigration appellate
body, upheld last week a grant of bond to an 18-year-old Haitian
who had been imprisoned since his arrival as part of a boatload
of 230 Haitians who landed in Key Biscayne, Florida, on October
29, 2002. The young man has asked to be released to the custody
of his family who are residents of South Florida. The Board found
that U.S. law requires an individualized determination of release,
thus calling into question the legitimacy of the Administration’s
decision to detain virtually all the Haitians who arrived last year.
The Board’s decision opened the door to the release of dozens
of Haitians who had been granted bonds by the immigration courts,
only to have the INS invoke national security concerns and its regulatory
authority to stay those bonds until further review by the Board.
Invoking DHS’s new authority over immigration matters, however,
Under Secretary for Border and Transportation Security Asa Hutchison
again referred the decision to the Attorney General and requested
that he stay the Board’s grant of bond. Under Secretary Hutchison
also requested that the Attorney General stay any other bond determinations
involving Haitians who arrived last fall. Thus, DHS has aggressively
sought to restore the blanket detention policy initiated in response
to the flow of Haitian refugees who have attempted to flee escalating
violence in their homeland.
“As the United States seeks to protect the safety of the
American people, it is inexplicable as to why we would be wasting
our limited resources on the prolonged detention of Haitians. This
is a shocking abuse of power that does little to serve our national
interests,” says Cheryl Little, Executive Director of FIAC.
Prolonged detention is part of a series of extraordinary enforcement
measures the Bush Administration has launched since December 2001
to prevent Haitians from accessing the U.S. asylum system. These
steps include interdiction of Haitian boats on the high seas and
within the territorial waters of the United States; summary return
of interdicted Haitians with no screening of their asylum claims
unless a person explicitly expresses a fear of return; resettlement
to third countries as far away as Australia for those few Haitians
granted refugee status; and application of expedited removal procedures
and fast-tracked asylum determinations that result in most Haitians
having to present their asylum cases without benefit of counsel.
The Bush Administration has justified these harsh measures as necessary
to protect U.S. national security.
Eleanor Acer, Asylum Director, Lawyers Committee for Human Rights,
noted, “It is time to restore our historical commitment to
the protection of refugees. The United States has a long history
of sheltering victims of religious, political, ethnic and other
forms of persecution. Haitians typically turn to us when conditions
in their country make it unsafe for them to remain at home. Offering
them a safe haven represents the best of America that should not
be sacrificed needlessly simply by invoking the phrase ‘national
security.’”
FIAC, the Lawyers Committee, and the Women’s Commission are
calling upon the Bush Administration to restore the right of Haitians
to seek asylum. They are united in the belief that U.S. national
security can be balanced against the U.S. obligation to protect
refugees without sacrificing the human rights of asylum seekers
and subjecting them to the trauma of imprisonment.
|