Refugee Women Fleeing Persecution Face Unfair
U.S. Laws
LCHR Report Outlines Barriers to Asylum
NEW YORK - LCHR released a report today documenting the harsh
and unfair treatment under U.S. law and practice that refugee women
face when they seek asylum here. The report, “Refugee Women
at Risk,” tells the stories of 13 women who fled forced marriage,
rape, forced abortion, domestic violence, and other gender-related
violence and sought protection in the U.S., only to be detained, deported
summarily, or otherwise treated unfairly.
“Because of unfair U.S. immigration laws, refugee women who
seek asylum in the U.S. often face significant barriers in striving
to win the protection they deserve,” said Eleanor Acer, Director
of the Asylum Program at the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights.
“When a woman with a gender-based asylum claim is barred from
asylum because of summary deportation procedures or an unrealistic
filing deadline, or when a woman fleeing from domestic violence
is detained, and forced to choose between a lengthy separation from
her young child and abandoning her claim for refuge, something is
very wrong with our laws and procedures.”
The challenges that women face have only increased in the last
year in the wake of government measures taken in the aftermath of
September 11; many of these measures have deprived non-citizens
of due process. As a result, refugee women, already among the most
vulnerable of the already-vulnerable refugee population, are at
even greater risk of unfair detention, deportation or mistreatment.
Among these new government measures are the expansion of INS detention
authority, the gutting of the immigration appeals process, and the
transfer of the INS's immigration functions to the Department of
Homeland Security - a transfer that will occur in March 2003.
The United States has a long history of protecting refugees, yet
the ability of refugees to gain asylum was undermined in 1996 by
a new immigration law called the “Illegal Immigration Reform
and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996.” Some of the barriers
created by that law include:
- A summary “expedited removal”
process which gives INS inspectors at airports and borders -
rather than trained immigration judges - the power to order
the immediate deportation of a person who arrives in the U.S.
without proper travel documents;
- “Mandatory detention” of asylum
seekers who are subject to the expedited process; and
- A filing deadline that bars most asylum
claims not filed within one year of a refugeeās arrival.
The experience of Beatrice Okum, a Sudanese Christian refugee,
illustrates the severe impact of these barriers on refugee women.
At age 15, Beatrice was forced into slavery for 14 years after fleeing
her home in Southern Sudan and being separated from her mother,
brothers and sisters. When she finally was able to escape slavery,
she came to the U.S. to seek asylum. Beatrice was handcuffed, shackled
and brought to a detention facility where she was jailed for nearly
five months.
Beatrice recalls her time in the Elizabeth Detention Center in New
Jersey, “watching daily the hopelessness, the ache, the anguish
on the faces of fellow inmates as they are filled with fear and
uncertainty, because we are subjected to a system where hope often
dies before it is realized.” Much of her time in detention
invoked flashbacks to her experiences in slavery. “I am only
fighting for freedom,” she said during her period of detention.
“I only want to be safe.” Beatrice was finally released
after being granted asylum in 2002.
The Lawyers Committee urges the U.S. government to restore fairness
to the asylum process so that refugees like Beatrice, who have already
suffered so much, are treated fairly and humanely. To ensure this,
the U.S. asylum system must be reformed to:
- Limit expedited removal to immigration
emergencies.
- Restore due process and entrust deportation
decisions to trained immigration judges.
- Improve the conduct of “secondary”
inspection by immigration authorities.
- Reform asylum parole procedures and provide
for immigration judge review of INS parole denials.
- Implement alternatives to detention for
asylum seekers who present no threat to the community.
- Eliminate the one-year filing deadline.
“Restoring fairness to the asylum process is more important
than ever,” Acer said. “A fair asylum system is essential
to ensure that the U.S. lives up to its obligation to protect the
victims of human rights abuses who flee here in search of refuge.”
“Restoring fairness to the asylum process is more important
than ever,” Acer said. “A fair asylum system is essential
to ensure that the U.S. lives up to its obligation to protect the
victims of human rights abuses who flee here in search of refuge.”
Click
here to read the full report.
|